April 1st Jokes, Part 2: Parodying NFTs
On making statements through jokes, the off-cliff method of learning, and lucky breaks.
Table of Contents
The ineluctable pull of online discourse
When I decided to “stop whining and go do something” about the sorry state of the web, it was (partly) due to seeing how much time fannish folks (me included) were wasting on increasingly less-useful discourse1. This was honestly a great decision, and I wish I could say I then never discoursed again. Old habits, however, die hard. Even with my newfound worksona (who has thankfully stayed away from fandom wank), I sometimes manage to drag myself into digging way too much into the controversial topic du jour–a pull that is especially hard to resist when that topic sits at the intersection of my special interests.
”This is important. Everyone is wrong on the internet.”2
Historically, the biggest culprit (and the star of this story) has been NFT discourse. At the time, I already wrote a way-too-long article (sorry sorry sorry) about my feelings. The tl;dr: as it often happens with discourse, people on all sides missed part of the picture, or at least flattened some aspects of the problem.3 But while the arguments on the other side of the divide can be frustrating, nothing beats the frustration of your side getting a particular aspect of the issue wrong.
In particular, one argument kept riling me up: the confident assertion that people online wouldn’t spend money on “meaningless JPEGs”. As a fandom person, I simply knew deep in my guts that this was not true4. Seeing people continuing to parrot this talking point (and NFTers rightfully shooting it down) was driving me up a wall.